As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It is also important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual duration of service nearly violates all the service structure as being a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention with the legislation nor in the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents from the boy or Woman usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.
The ruling of your first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right up until or Until both new regulation is created, or a higher court rules differently.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion entails a move to some higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, to the other hand, provides financial relief by inserting an employee in a higher pay back scale, without altering their career duties or position. It's a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained from the same spend scale for a protracted time, particularly when they absence alternatives for promotion. Upgradation is actually a policy Software used to relieve the hardship of very long-term stagnation. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. From the meantime police shall remain neutral within the private dispute between the parties, however, if any in the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall consider prompt action against them under legislation. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution outside the house traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as an important alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and competently.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the assorted lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
The legislation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair into the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in get more info dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage isn't extensive, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.